Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Citation
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Parent Document
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Jurisdiction
- Kentucky (state)
- Effective Date
- 1953-03-27
Other Sections in This Document (12)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
- Marshall v. Fraser, 258 S.W.2d 12 (1953)
Full Text
574 charsThe lessor contends that the lessee breached his covenant to repair when he told her he “was through” and' a right of action was immediately vested in her, which could not be defeated or affected by the occurrence of the second fire. However, the brother of the lessee continued to occupy the building and the rent was paid up at the time of the fire. The repairs which the lessee undertook were to make the premises fit' for his occupancy, and no time was specified as to when they should be made. As stated in Tiffany on Landlord and Tenant, Vol. 1, Section 117, page 774: