Based upon the above, there is no merit to Respondent's lack of jurisdiction argument. Thus,
service is sustained in the case at bar.
Was Petitioner Required to Serve a Timely Golub Notice (120/90 Notice
of Nonrenewal) Upon Respondent?
Petitioner served the Notice of Intention to Commence Court Action, dated July 2, 2018 to
terminate Respondent's tenancy as of September 30, 2018. The ground set forth for nonrenewal
of the Lease is Respondent's allegedly living at 801 Tiller Drive, Forked River, New Jersey.
The Notice specifically states the following:
"PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE, that this NOTICE is served upon
you pursuant to Section 9 NYCRR §§2504.4(d) and 2508.1(a) and other applicable
provisions of law.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER
NOTICE, that you are hereby required to quit, vacate and surrender possession of the
Apartment involved to the Landlord/Owner on or before September 30, 2018, that being at least
ninety (90), but not more than one hundred fifty (150) days, from the date of service of this
NOTICE, as well as the day on which your term expires. Further and unless you voluntarily
vacate the Apartment, as aforesaid, the Landlord/Owner will commence summary proceedings
under the applicable statutes to remove you from said Apartment for the holding over after the
expiration of your term in the District Court of the County of Nassau, First District, Hempstead
Part, and will demand in said proceeding the fair market value of your use and occupancy of the
Apartment during such holding over, together with an award of its reasonable attorney's
fees.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE, that on or
after September 30, 2018, that being at least THIRTY (30) DAYS following service of this
NOTICE upon you, the Landlord/Owner intends to commence an action or proceeding pursuant