Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Citation
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Parent Document
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Jurisdiction
- Kentucky (state)
- Effective Date
- 1961-06-02
Other Sections in This Document (29)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
- Venters v. Reynolds, 354 S.W.2d 521 (1961)
Full Text
855 charsAccording to the stipulation, lessees on September 17, 1958, were in default in the payment of rent in the sum of $1,500. The trial court so found. Lessees contend that the continued insistence of the lessor upon forfeiture of the lease deprived them of the beneficial use of the premises and amounted to a breach of the covenant of quiet and peaceable possession, which was a constructive eviction and excused their failure to pay rent. Lessees admitted that they have remained in “technical possession” of the premises. To constitute a constructive eviction, the acts of the landlord must be such as will justify and warrant the tenant in leaving the premises and there must be an abandonment in fact. Estes v. Gatliff, 291 Ky. 93, 163 S.W.2d 273. Lessees cannot thus excuse their failure to pay rent since there was no actual surrender of the premises.