In his reply to the respondent's argument that he failed to raise the issue of noise at his previous appearances, Mr. Clark provided certified complaint letters, dated October 2, 2000, December 5, 2000, and May 6, 2002, written to St. James Towers Management, as well as to the board of directors. Additionally, Mr. Clark indicated that he did not complain about the noise at the time he made the complaints of the necessary repairs because, "[he] knew nothing would be done about it, and was pursuing the Supreme Court." Further, Mr. Clark explicates that he first composed the June 9, 2005 letter to Mr. Lippa addressing the noise and breach of warranty of habitability only when he realized that his "court case [was taking] longer than [he] thought and the noise continu[ed]." Mr. Clark also responded to his default with regards to Mr. Lippa's July 21, 2006 decision by stating that he did not abide by the said decision "because it would be condoning the discredit of noise indicated in the fact finding section."