Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

O'Rourke v. Lexington Real Estate Co., 365 S.W.3d 584 (2011)

Citation
O'Rourke v. Lexington Real Estate Co., 365 S.W.3d 584 (2011)
Parent Document
O'Rourke v. Lexington Real Estate Co., 365 S.W.3d 584 (2011)
Jurisdiction
Kentucky (state)
Effective Date
2011-10-07

Full Text

1,204 chars
Moreover, for another sound reason the attorney fees claim against O’Rourke must fail. In the complaint, a party must state in plain and adequate terms the basis for any claim. Caldwell v. Frazier, 304 S.W.2d 922 (Ky.1957). CR 8.01 provides that a claim “shall contain (a) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (b) a demand for judgment for the relief to which he deems himself entitled.” Our review of the complaint filed herein reveals that Lexington Real Estate failed to properly plead any claim for attorney’s fees, and certainly no claim under KRS 383.660(3). Although the complaint requested an award of attorney’s fees in the ad damnum clause, it failed to state any claim for attorney’s fees in the body of the complaint. CR 8.01 requires notice of the claim, and O’Rourke was not given notice of any acts or omissions alleged against him that would authorize application of KRS 383.660(3). Although KRS 383.660(3) creates a limited exception to the general rule that each party shall pay its own attorney’s fees, to invoke that exception notice of the claim must be pled to join the issue. See Pike v. George, 434 S.W.2d 626 (Ky.App.1968).