Edna Allen v. Dan And Bills Rv Park, 428 P.3d 376 (2018)

Citation: Edna Allen v. Dan And Bills Rv Park, 428 P.3d 376 (2018)
Parent Document: Edna Allen v. Dan And Bills Rv Park, 428 P.3d 376 (2018)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2018-10-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4544089/edna-allen-v-dan-and-bills-rv-park/ ↗

Full Text

911 chars

5
  Allen assigns error to a number of the OAH’s findings of fact, including that (1) no one rents a
specific lot in the Park; (2) the Park requires all residents to be ready to move any time; (3) none
of the units have anything permanently attached to them, by order of the landlord and in
compliance with county code; (4) none of the units are hardwired for electricity or plumbed for
septic and water; and (5) Mr. Bordenik’s mobile home is not permanently installed at the Park and
he has no intention of permanently installing it. However, Allen fails to provide legal argument
or support for these assignments of error. Therefore, we do not consider these claims of error.
RAP 10.3(a)(6); Cowiche Canyon, 118 Wn.2d at 809. As a result, the OAH’s findings are verities
on appeal. Galvis v. Dep’t of Transp., 140 Wn. App. 693, 709, 167 P.3d 584 (2007) review denied,
163 Wn.2d 1041 (2008). 13
No. 49836-7-II

Other Sections in This Document (338)

Full Text