Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Draper MacHine Works, Inc. v. Hagberg, 663 P.2d 141 (1983)

Citation
Draper MacHine Works, Inc. v. Hagberg, 663 P.2d 141 (1983)
Parent Document
Draper MacHine Works, Inc. v. Hagberg, 663 P.2d 141 (1983)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
1983-04-27

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text

382 chars
The primary substantive argument presented by Hagberg is that he did not have to pay rent because Draper breached the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment by permitting Mission trucks on the property. Therefore, the issue is whether under the facts submitted, viewed most favorably to Hagberg, a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment could be shown justifying nonpayment of rent.