Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Citation
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Parent Document
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 1988-06-30
Other Sections in This Document (50)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
Full Text
631 chars[1] However, there is considerable authority that, where both parties prevail on major issues, neither is entitled to attorney fees. McGary v. Westlake Investors, 99 Wn.2d 280, 661 P.2d 971 (1983); Tallman v. Durussel, 44 Wn. App. 181, 721 P.2d 985, review denied, 106 Wn.2d 1013 (1986); Rowe v. Floyd, 29 Wn. App. 532, 629 P.2d 925 (1981). Here, each party successfully defended against a *912 major claim by the other. It would be inequitable to award substantial fees in these circumstances, particularly where the money judgment involved actually was simply a recognition that Ms. Morford was owed a portion of her own deposit.