Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Citation
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Parent Document
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 1988-06-30
Other Sections in This Document (50)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
- Sardam v. Morford, 756 P.2d 174 (1988)
Full Text
626 charsHowever, there is considerable authority that, where both parties prevail on major issues, neither is entitled to attorney fees. McGary v. Westlake Investors, 99 Wn.2d 280, 661 P.2d 971 (1983); Tallman v. Durussel, 44 Wn. App. 181, 721 P.2d 985, review denied, 106 Wn.2d 1013 (1986); Rowe v. Floyd, 29 Wn. App. 532, 629 P.2d 925 (1981). Here, each party successfully defended against a *912major claim by the other. It would be inequitable to award substantial fees in these circumstances, particularly where the money judgment involved actuálly was simply a recognition that Ms. Morford was owed a portion of her own deposit.