Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 170 Wash. 2d 380 (2010)

Citation
Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 170 Wash. 2d 380 (2010)
Parent Document
Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 170 Wash. 2d 380 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2010-11-04

Other Sections in This Document (97)

Full Text

593 chars
¶8 The Court of Appeals characterized Eastwood’s claims as economic losses because they “resulted] from [Horse Harbor’s] actions that led to damages and breach of the lease agreement.” Eastwood, 2008 WL 1801332, at *2, 2008 Wash. App. LEXIS 916, at *5. Based on these circumstances, the court held the economic loss rule applied and limited Eastwood to recovery only for breach of lease, and Warren and the Dalings could not be individually liable for the damages. 2008 WL 1801332, at *2-3, 2008 Wash. App. LEXIS 916, at *6-8. The Court of Appeals denied Eastwood’s motion for reconsideration.