Sec. 8
- Citation
- Sec. 8
- Parent Document
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 1973-10-25
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1452046/foisy-v-wyman/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (140)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 6
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
- Sec. 8
Full Text
839 charsSee Sowers v. Lewis, 49 Wn.2d 891, 307 P.2d 1064 (1957). See also Erz v. Reese, 157 Wash. 32, 288 P. 255 (1930) (wherein we stated on page 35 that “we have never adopted the strictest rule of construction as to the form or contents of such notices under our unlawful detainer statutes, chiefly for the reason, doubtless, that the statutes prescribe no form.”). In the Provident Mutual case the notice was defective in three respects: (1) It contained the signature of the agent rather than the owner; (2) it overstated the amount of rent due by $165 as found by the trial court; and (3) it defectively described the premises. Although we did not specifically address the issue of the overstatement of the amount of rent due, we did hold the notice substantially complied with the requirements of Rem. Comp. Stat. § 812 (now RCW 59.12.030).