Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)

Citation: Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Parent Document: Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 1973-10-25
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1452046/foisy-v-wyman/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (140)

Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973)
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 6
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8
Sec. 8

Full Text

329 chars

We find the reasoning of these cases extremely persuasive. Any realistic analysis of the lessor-lessee or landlord-tenant situation leads to the conclusion that the tenant’s promise to pay rent is in exchange for the landlord’s promise to provide a livable dwelling. As Judge Skelly Wright stated in the Javins case on page 1074: