Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Sjogren v. Properties of Pacific Northwest, LLC, 75 P.3d 592 (2003)

Citation
Sjogren v. Properties of Pacific Northwest, LLC, 75 P.3d 592 (2003)
Parent Document
Sjogren v. Properties of Pacific Northwest, LLC, 75 P.3d 592 (2003)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2003-08-26

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text

700 chars
We review a summary judgment de novo. Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. Worthington, *594 121 Wash.2d 810, 813, 854 P.2d 1072 (1993). We consider all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Mason v. Kenyon Zero Storage, 71 Wash.App. 5, 8-9, 856 P.2d 410 (1993). Absent a genuine issue as to any material fact, the moving party is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Condor Enters., Inc. v. Boise Cascade Corp., 71 Wash.App. 48, 54, 856 P.2d 713 (1993) (citing CR 56(c)). Summary judgment is proper "only if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion from all of the evidence." Hansen v. Friend, 118 Wash.2d 476, 485, 824 P.2d 483 (1992).