Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Citation
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Parent Document
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-06-14
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4939487/pruitt-v-savage/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (33)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
- Pruitt v. Savage, 128 Wash. App. 327 (2005)
Full Text
432 chars¶14 The parties debate whether, in this landlord-tenant context, section 343 applies only to common areas. The answer is typically yes, because by definition a landlord is not the “possessor” of noncommon areas.9 Concluding that the liability of the Savages and McMenamin’s is not affected by section 343, and noting the liability of the Jacksons (if any) is not before us, we hold that section 343 does not apply in this appeal. II