Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Citation
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-09-04
Other Sections in This Document (56)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
Full Text
441 chars[8] Leased premises are deemed "untenantable" for the purposes of constructive eviction under the quiet enjoyment covenant when "the premises are unfit for the purpose for which they are leased." 5 THOMPSON ON REAL PROPERTY § 40.22(c)(3)(i), at 144 (David A. Thomas ed., 1994). If the premises are "uninhabitable," they are certainly "untenantable." [9] 106 Wash.App. 811, 822, 25 P.3d 467 (2001). [10] 104 Wash.App. 464, 17 P.3d 641 (2001).