Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Citation
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-09-04
Other Sections in This Document (56)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
- Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)
Full Text
467 charsWe again note that a claim for personal injuries by a tenant can be premised on three distinct legal theories: contract (a rental agreement), common law obligations imposed on a landlord, and the Washington Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 1973 (Landlord-Tenant Act), chapter 59.18 RCW. In Dexheimer *981 v. CDS, Inc.[1] we concluded that the remedies available to a tenant under the Landlord-Tenant Act were limited to those outlined in the statute. We were wrong.