Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)

Citation: Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)
Parent Document: Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2001-06-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2587519/lian-v-stalick/ ↗

Full Text

711 chars

To simply remand on that question is to invite the trier of fact to "go find" some theory upon which to predicate a damage award. That is wrong. This case was fully tried by competent counsel. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were presented by the *481 lawyer for Ms. White and signed by the trial court. I have reviewed those findings of fact and conclusions of law, and under the law as it now exists in Washington, they do not support a judgment for Ms. White. We should then reverse and dismiss. For these reasons I respectfully dissent. NOTES [1] Chapter 59.18 RCW. [2] 115 Wash.2d 506, 519-22, 799 P.2d 250 (1990). [3] 109 Wash.2d 406, 745 P.2d 1284 (1987). [4] 129 Wash.2d 43, 914 P.2d 728 (1996).

Other Sections in This Document (107)

Full Text