Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)

Citation
Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)
Parent Document
Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2001-06-19

Other Sections in This Document (107)

Full Text

795 chars
Reliance on cases adjudicating disputes between condominium owners and builder vendors over the quality of the construction and materials and the owner's right to damages *478 for "allegedly inferior stucco substitute" simply have no applicability to a claim against a landlord for personal injuries. The discussion, therefore, in Atherton Condominium Apartment-Owners Association Board v. Blume Development Company,[2] while interesting, is inapposite. The same is true for Stuart v. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc.[3] (condominium owners sought recovery for defects in private decks and walkways; court held that the implied warranty of habitability did not apply because the defects did not render the units unfit to occupy). These cases inform us of nothing pertinent to this dispute.