Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001)

Citation: Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001)
Parent Document: Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2001-06-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4931615/lian-v-stalick/ ↗

Full Text

678 chars

To simply remand on that question is to invite the trier of fact to “go find” some theory upon which to predicate a damage award. That is wrong. This case was fully tried by competent counsel. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were presented by the lawyer for Ms. White and signed by the trial court. I have reviewed those findings of fact and conclusions of law, and under the law as it now exists in Washington, they do not support a judgment for Ms. White. We should then reverse and dismiss. For these reasons I respectfully dissent. Chapter 59.18 RCW. 115 Wn.2d 506, 519-22, 799 P.2d 250 (1990). 109 Wn.2d 406, 745 P.2d 1284 (1987). 129 Wn.2d 43, 914 P.2d 728 (1996).

Other Sections in This Document (99)

Full Text