Holmes v Worthen (2008 NY Slip Op 28095)
Holmes v Worthen
2008 NY Slip Op 28095 [19 Misc 3d 33]
Accepted for Miscellaneous Reports Publication
AT2
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 7, 2008
[*1]
Narcisa M. Holmes, Appellant,
v
Charles Worthen, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, February 29, 2008
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Narcisa M. Holmes, appellant pro se. Charles Worthen, respondent pro se.
{**19 Misc 3d at 34} OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment reversed without costs and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,200.
After vacating the apartment she had rented from defendant for 13 years, plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover her $2,200 security deposit, plus interest thereon. Defendant acknowledges that he was provided with a $2,200 security deposit, receiving $1,100 from plaintiff and $1,100 from her boyfriend, who vacated the apartment before plaintiff.