Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Rolling Meadows Cooperative, Inc. v. Macatee, 904 N.W.2d 920 (2017)

Citation
Rolling Meadows Cooperative, Inc. v. Macatee, 904 N.W.2d 920 (2017)
Parent Document
Rolling Meadows Cooperative, Inc. v. Macatee, 904 N.W.2d 920 (2017)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2017-11-27

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text

445 chars
MacAtee argues that Rolling Meadows’s “eviction was based on [her] failure to pay the rent increase,” not on her holdover status, and that she therefore “was allowed to redeem her tenancy” under Minn. Stat. § 504B.291 (2016), anytime before possession was delivered to Rolling Meadows. She also argues that the district court identified her “failure to pay the rent increase” as her only “material violation.” MacAtee’s arguments are unavailing.