Hook & Ladder Apartments, L.P., Respondent, vs. Nichole Nalewaja, Appellant, John Doe, et. al., Defendants (2025)

Citation: Hook & Ladder Apartments, L.P., Respondent, vs. Nichole Nalewaja, Appellant, John Doe, et. al., Defendants (2025)
Parent Document: Hook & Ladder Apartments, L.P., Respondent, vs. Nichole Nalewaja, Appellant, John Doe, et. al., Defendants (2025)
Jurisdiction: Minnesota (state)
Effective Date: 2025-09-24
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10695914/hook-ladder-apartments-lp-resp... ↗

Full Text

548 chars

10
        To the extent that the Christy court relied on the landlord’s subjective intention, this
was an error. See Kenny, 112 N.W. at 221 (explaining that a landlord’s subjective intent
is not relevant to the waiver-by-acceptance doctrine). We cite this case only as an example
of an automatic electronic payment in the private housing context. Without considering
the Christy landlord’s intent, the fact that the landlord made no effort to return the
automatic payment would be relevant to determining whether the landlord accepted the
payment.

Other Sections in This Document (384)

Full Text