Section 42
- Citation
- Section 42
- Parent Document
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-04-22
Other Sections in This Document (72)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
Full Text
1,053 charsThe district court’s findings regarding the numerous police calls, the inadequate supervision of a guest, the fraudulent application for a parking permit, and the likelihood of an unauthorized tenant, all which violated the terms of the lease, were not clearly erroneous. Appellants urge this court to treat each of these violations as a minor, isolated incident that should not be sufficient to terminate a tenancy in section 42 housing. This we cannot do. A landlord need only show “good cause” in order to terminate a tenancy in section 42 housing. Throughout their tenancy, appellants not only violated several of the lease’s provisions, but they did so repeatedly. Unlike in the earlier successful appeal of appellants’ prior eviction notice, Cimarron Village here provided extensive reasons for its termination of the lease. Those stated reasons were supported by testimony at the hearing. The district court properly concluded that the lease violations, considered as a whole, constituted good cause for termination of appellants’ lease. DECISION