Section 42
- Citation
- Section 42
- Parent Document
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-04-22
Other Sections in This Document (72)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
Full Text
773 charsNotwithstanding application of the good-cause standard, we are not insensitive to appellants’ argument urging this court .to establish a bright-line definition of that standard. Arguably, a bright-line definition of “good cause” could assist both landlords and tenants. We conclude, however, that such a definition would amount to second-guessing the language of section 42 and 24 C.F.R. §§ 247.2 and 247.3. Those sections demonstrate an intent not to require the same standards for eviction under all federally subsidized programs. Until Congress or the drafters of the federal regulations provide the courts with a specific meaning for “good cause,” we believe the most prudent course for this court is to continue to determine “good cause” on a case-by-case basis. 9 II.