Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
1,734 charsno fault of the buyer are not property of the seller’s estate.” Br. of Resp’t at 20-21. We agree with this general principle, and as discussed above, the receivership statute essentially instructs as much. RCW 7.60.130. But the crux here is that the $450,000 is no longer in escrow and again, the only funds available to return the deposit are funds within the receivership estate. LGI also argues, citing to bankruptcy principles and specifically In re Summit Airlines,14 that funds no longer held aside in an escrow account, but traceable to an escrow account, must be returned to the depositor of those funds in the event of a breach of contract. However, we need not look to bankruptcy law. While the receivership statute may not contemplate the exact facts of this case, the receivership statute provides instruction on what happens when a party to a rejected executory contract has a claim. 14 94 B.R. 367, 368 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988), aff’d, 102 B.R. 32 (E.D. Pa. 1989). 19 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 59088-3-II RCW 7.60.130(2) states: The other party to an executory contract . . . that is rejected by a general receiver may take such steps as may be necessary under applicable law to terminate or cancel the contract . . . . The claim of a party to an executory contract . . . resulting from a general receiver’s rejection of it shall be served upon the receiver in the manner provided for by RCW 7.60.210 within thirty days following the rejection. (Emphasis added.) Courts look to the plain language of a statute and its context to determine legislative intent. Umpqua Bank, 194 Wn. App. at 693. While there are similarities between bankruptcy law and