Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 59088-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
1,445 chars2 There is no record that LGI had a security interest in the form of a deed of trust for the Phase 2 property, despite allocating $450,000 of the $1,621,000 deposit for the Property to Phase 2. 3 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 59088-3-II In January 2019, ECM entered into a loan agreement with Construction Loan Services, LLC (CLS),3 in which ECM borrowed $3,524,122.22. The loan was secured by the Property in a Deed of Trust, dated January 31, 2019 (CLS Deed). The CLS Deed provided that in the event of a default, CLS could apply to the superior court for the appointment of a receiver.4 CLS and ECM subsequently amended the loan and increased the principal to $4,154,122.22. The loan was set to mature in March 2020. In July 2019, LGI and ECM closed on the Phase 1 property. Per the terms of the PSA, Phase 2 closing was to occur by December 2020. B. ECM DEFAULT AND SUBSEQUENT RECEIVERSHIP By March 2020, ECM had failed to make payments to CLS or pay off its loan, thereby defaulting per the terms of the loan agreement. Then, in May 2020, CLS petitioned the superior court to appoint a receiver to “ensure to the orderly and efficient liquidation of the Property for the benefit of all creditors.” CP at 894. In November 2020, the superior court appointed a general receiver, Pacific Crest Realty Advisors, LLC (Receiver). The order appointing a receiver stated in part: