Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Fritz v. Warthen, 213 N.W.2d 339 (1973)

Citation
Fritz v. Warthen, 213 N.W.2d 339 (1973)
Parent Document
Fritz v. Warthen, 213 N.W.2d 339 (1973)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1973-11-30

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Full Text

590 chars
Before commenting on these issues, we should point out that the present appeals are taken from nonappealable orders. According to Minn. St. 566.12, an appeal is allowed only from the judgment of restitution and not from an order directing entry thereof. Northwest Holding Co. v. Evanson, 265 Minn. 562, 122 N. W. 2d 596 (1963); Goldberg v. Fields, 247 Minn. 213, 76 N. W. 2d 668 (1956). However, because of the important questions presented by this case, we are prompted to exercise discretionary review under Rule 105, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and decide the merits of the case.