Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)

Citation
Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
Parent Document
Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1989-06-13

Other Sections in This Document (62)

Full Text

661 chars
Finally, Love requests damages for a March 1987 injury sustained when the storm door slammed and a piece of glass cut her right hand and wrist. This claim was not pleaded in Love’s complaint. At the close of trial Love’s attorney made a motion to amend the pleadings to conform to the evidence, in'accordance with Minn.R. Civ.P. 15.02 (1988). The trial court did not rule on the motion, and did not include findings on this issue in its judgment and decree. Because Love did not, by a motion for amended findings, obtain a trial court ruling, the issue is not appropriate for review. See Frank v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co., 336 N.W.2d 307, 311 (Minn.1983).