Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Citation
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-06-13
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1669707/love-v-amsler/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (62)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- § 63
- § 63
Full Text
611 charsIt was established at trial, primarily through the testimony of housing inspector Roger R. Hankey, that throughout Love’s tenancy the home was in extremely poor condition. The home’s only heat source, a gas space heater in the living room, had a missing glass panel and was “red-tagged” by a Minnegasco employee as unsafe to operate. Amsler would not replace the panel, and told Love to operate the space heater without it. When Love and her family vacated the house in June 1987 the walls were covered with soot. Amsler included the cost of repainting these walls in the damages he sought to recover from Love.