Section 504B
- Citation
- Section 504B
- Parent Document
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2018-05-07
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8284529/ellis-v-doe/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (20)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
Full Text
406 charsWe also note that Ellis 's analysis of the interplay between a Fritz defense and a rent-escrow action did not apply to that case's holding, that the landlord did not violate the statutory covenants of habitability, and was therefore dictum. See State v. Rainer , 258 Minn. 168, 179, 103 N.W.2d 389, 396 (1960) ("Of course, a ruling not necessary to the decision of a case can be regarded as only dictum.").