Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Citation
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Parent Document
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2018-05-07
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8284529/ellis-v-doe/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (20)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Ellis v. Doe, 915 N.W.2d 24 (2018)
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
- Section 504B
Full Text
433 charsHere, landlord argues that tenant did not provide written notice of habitability violations prior to asserting a Fritz defense. But this argument would require the application of section 504B.385 rent-escrow action's requirements to tenant's assertion of a Fritz habitability defense to eviction. Fritz does not contain a written-notice requirement. Nor does section 504B.385 indicate that it applies to a Fritz habitability defense.