Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Citation
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Parent Document
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2018-02-07
Other Sections in This Document (15)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
Full Text
562 charsTo the extent that either party submitted new evidence on appeal that was not in the record before the Small Claims Court, the court cannot consider it. “[A]n appellate court ordinarily ‘has no factfinding function. It cannot receive new evidence from the parties, determine where the truth actually lies, and base its decision on that determination.’” Nat’l Anti- Hunger Coal. v. Exec. Comm. of President’s Private Sector Survey on Cost Control, 711 F.2d 1071, 1075 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (quoting Goland v. CIA, 607 F.2d 339, 371 (D.C.Cir. 1979) (per curiam)). Order