Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Citation
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Parent Document
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2018-02-07
Other Sections in This Document (15)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
- Double E. Properties, LLC v. Cheever (2018)
Full Text
700 charsAppellant does not argue that the Judge applied the law incorrectly or that the facts admitted at the trial do not support the judgment. Appellant specifically does not dispute the critical finding that she did not send the Defendant an accounting of the $900 security deposit within 14 days. She simply asks to increase the amount of unpaid rent by an additional month. Appellant’s claim as described in the complaint, and Landlord’s testimony at trial, was that the remaining rent due was $3,200 as shown in her accounting records. The Court awarded her judgment in that amount minus the security deposit. See 9 V.S.A. § 4461(e) (specifying the remedy for wrongful withholding of security deposit).