Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Moorcroft v. Severance (2018)

Citation
Moorcroft v. Severance (2018)
Parent Document
Moorcroft v. Severance (2018)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2018-03-12

Other Sections in This Document (73)

Full Text

417 chars
Once John’s RFA against Jim expired, and John receive an order to extend the “no
contact” provisions, Jim had the right to return to the home and resume occupancy there. The
court finds that John’s verbal refusals to allow access, and conduct in changing locks, violated
John’s duties to Jim under the VRRAA (both as Jim’s co-tenant, and to Jim as the VRRAA
landlord) and provided good cause to terminate the tenancy.