DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 4467

Citation
§ 4467
Parent Document
E & E Properties, Inc. v. Tatro (2012)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2012-04-11
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489809/e-e-properties-inc-v-tatro/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (197)

Full Text

508 chars 
The merit of this argument might have been better received by the trial court had it been
        supported by the necessary documentation and proffered before summary judgment was
        granted for defendant . . .[U.S. Bank] having failed to support its position, the court was not
        required to give U.S. Bank another opportunity to prove its case following the grant of summary
        judgment, and did not abuse its discretion in denying the request at that late stage in the
        proceeding.