DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 4467

Citation
§ 4467
Parent Document
E & E Properties, Inc. v. Tatro (2012)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2012-04-11
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489809/e-e-properties-inc-v-tatro/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (197)

Full Text

423 chars 
4
 Here, as before, the relevance of the Andrus decision is limited because the concerns over ambiguity in Andrus
were primarily motivated by the fact that the tenant would have been able to cure the defect if he were given an
unambiguous notice of termination. See Andrus, 2008 VT 48 at ¶ 14 (noting that “could avoid termination by
paying the rent” before the date on a notice of termination) (citing 9 V.S.A. § 4467(a)).