Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Citation
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Parent Document
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2024-09-23
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10124239/garcia-v-birch/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (29)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
Full Text
612 charsThis brings the Court to the question of whether it can permit the amendment of the complaint under V.R.C.P. 15(a), or if Defendants must re-file the complaint on or before September 13, 2024 when the 60-day window under 9 V.S.A. § 4467(k). The Court finds that Defendants’ arguments on this front are valid in that the original complaint appears to have been facially invalid given that at the time it was filed, the present no cause termination had not matured, and the underlying bases from the January 30, 2024 notices were so invalid as to render the original complaint invalid from the moment it was filed.