Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Citation
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Parent Document
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2024-09-23
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10124239/garcia-v-birch/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (29)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
- Garcia v. Birch (2024)
Full Text
600 charsThe first notices of termination, which the Plaintiffs taped to Defendants’ doors on January 30, 2024 are facially invalid. They do not cite to a proper provision under 9 V.S.A. § 4467 and appear to impose a re-set to the rental relationship by virtue of Mr. Schwagg’s passing. The notices do not cite to a date certain, and they appear to have been taped to the door of the units, which is not a method of delivery allowed under the definition of “actual notice” as that term is defined in 9 V.S.A. § 4451. For these reasons, these initial notices are invalid, and cannot sustain the present action.