Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Electric Man, Inc. v. Charos, 179 Vt. 351 (2006)

Citation
Electric Man, Inc. v. Charos, 179 Vt. 351 (2006)
Parent Document
Electric Man, Inc. v. Charos, 179 Vt. 351 (2006)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2006-02-10

Full Text

424 chars
Id. ¶ 24 (citations and quotations omitted). In reaching this conclusion, we relied particularly on Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983), an attomeys’-fees case under the federal Civil Rights Act in which the plaintiff had prevailed on some issues and not others. In response to the defendant’s argument that the plaintiff could receive fees only for the claims on which plaintiff prevailed, the Court in Hensley noted: