§ 4461
- Citation
- § 4461
- Parent Document
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2011-02-23
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2558043/in-re-soon-kwon/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (53)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 5009
- § 5009
- § 5009
Full Text
687 charsthan is fairly in the decision. The question in that case was whether a decision of a zoning board of adjustment was rendered beyond the statutory time deadline so that the permit was granted by operation of law. The facts were that the decision was rendered within the statutory time limit and the plaintiff received oral notice of the decision, but a copy was not sent by certified mail within that time limit, as required by statute. We held that the rendering of the decision within the statutory time limit, plus oral notice of the decision within that time, was sufficient to comply with the statute despite the delay in sending the copy by mail. Id. The main rationale of Hinsdale