Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001)

Citation
Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001)
Parent Document
Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2001-11-09

Other Sections in This Document (112)

Full Text

576 chars
Tenants attempt to buttress their argument that landlords were required to serve VSHA with a contemporaneous notice of nonrenewal by reference to eases from other courts construing the federal regulation “that previously applied to Section 8 tenancies.” At the .time the parties entered into the rental agreement, however, the regulation no longer applied. Instead, the regulations in effect, at the time the parties entered into the *87rental agreement and at the expiration of the tenancy, required that landlords serve only the tenants. 24 C.F.R. § 882.511 (1998) & (1999).