Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Meadowbrook Condominium Ass'n v. South Burlington Realty Corp., 565 A.2d 238 (1989)

Citation
Meadowbrook Condominium Ass'n v. South Burlington Realty Corp., 565 A.2d 238 (1989)
Parent Document
Meadowbrook Condominium Ass'n v. South Burlington Realty Corp., 565 A.2d 238 (1989)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
1989-06-23

Other Sections in This Document (98)

Full Text

741 chars
On review, a trial court's finding of fact will not be set aside unless it appears to be clearly erroneous when the supporting evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and any modifying evidence is disregarded. Peckham v. Peckham, 149 Vt. 388, 390, 543 A.2d 267, 268-69 (1988). At trial, plaintiff's expert testified that the cost of repairing the roads, including excavation and repaving, would be $105,000. Defendant's expert, on the other hand, testified that little excavation would be needed and that most of the necessary repairs could be effected through lesser measures such as application of asphalt overlays. This witness testified further that the cost of repair, carports included, would be $41,000.