RAL Automotive Group, Inc. v. Edwards, 151 N.H. 497 (2004)

Citation: RAL Automotive Group, Inc. v. Edwards, 151 N.H. 497 (2004)
Parent Document: RAL Automotive Group, Inc. v. Edwards, 151 N.H. 497 (2004)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2004-11-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8092953/ral-automotive-group-inc-v-edwards/ ↗

Full Text

749 chars

While representations were made at oral argument about the status of the property after the eviction of Minato, there is no evidence in the record regarding these representations. No factual findings have been made as to whether the lease is ongoing, is in breach, or has been terminated. Because such findings are crucial to a determination of whether enforcement of the obligation to post a letter of credit would be both available and equitable, we .vacate Judge McHugh’s orders.'We remand for a determination of whether the. lease is ongoing, in which case enforcement may, in the trial court’s discretion, be available, or whether the lease has been breached or terminated, making an action for damages the more appropriate vehicle for relief..

Other Sections in This Document (21)

Full Text