Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

RAL Automotive Group, Inc. v. Edwards, 151 N.H. 497 (2004)

Citation
RAL Automotive Group, Inc. v. Edwards, 151 N.H. 497 (2004)
Parent Document
RAL Automotive Group, Inc. v. Edwards, 151 N.H. 497 (2004)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2004-11-30

Full Text

471 chars
The court’s ruling is based upon “reasons clearly untenable,” at least in the absence of a factual finding that Edwards intended to terminate RAL’s liability under the lease by taking possession of the property. Arcidi, 150 N.H. at 704. While the issue before the court was discretionary, “[t]he discretion must be exercised, not in opposition to, but in accordance with, *500established principles of law.” Hanslin v. Keith, 120 N.H. 361, 364 (1980) (quotation omitted).