Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 877801 orderandopinion.pdf

Citation: Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 877801 orderandopinion.pdf
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Source verification: official_capture_completeness_unverified
Original Source: https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/877801%20orderandopinion.pdf ↗

Related Parts of This Source

Full Text

632 chars

17
We emphasize that, as we observed in View Ridge Estates Homeowners Ass’n v.
Guetter,
“[t]he essential goal in shifting fees (to either party) is to do rough justice, not to
achieve auditing perfection.” Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S. Ct. 2205,
180 L. Ed. 2d 45 (2011). Indeed, “the determination of fees ‘should not result in a
second major litigation.’” [Id.] at 838 (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424,
437, 103 S. Ct. 1933, 76 L. Ed. 2d 40 (1983)). We encourage the trial court and
the parties to keep as much in mind on remand.
30 Wn. App. 2d 612, 648-49, 546 P.3d 463, review denied, 554 P.3d 1225 (2024).
27