Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 877801 orderandopinion.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 877801 orderandopinion.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Related Parts of This Source

Full Text

1,718 chars
135 Wn.2d at 434. Lastly, the trial court must calculate the lodestar fee award “by

multiplying the reasonable hourly rate by the reasonable number of hours incurred,”

which the trial court may adjust up or down in “rare instances.” Id.

To show that it exercised its discretion and did not unquestionably accept fee

affidavits submitted by counsel, trial courts must make an adequate record upon which

they base an attorney fee award. Id. at 434-35. That is, a trial court must provide

articulable grounds for its attorney fee award to allow meaningful appellate review.

Taliesen Corp. v. Razore Land Co., 135 Wn. App. 106, 146-47, 144 P.3d 1185 (2006);

10
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.
87780-1-I/11

Peiffer v. Pro-Cut Concrete Cutting & Breaking Inc., 6 Wn. App. 2d 803, 833, 431 P.3d

1018 (2018). Courts must enter findings of fact and conclusion of law to establish a

proper record. Mahler, 135 Wn.2d at 435. Findings need not include explicit and

detailed hour-by-hour analysis of each lawyer’s time sheets, but they must articulate the

relevant factors and reasons the court relied on to allow appellate review of the awarded

amount. Absher Const. Co. v. Kent Sch. Dist. No. 415, 79 Wn. App. 841, 848, 917 P.2d

1086 (1995); see also Berryman, 177 Wn. App. at 658 (“The findings must show how

the court resolved disputed issues of fact and the conclusions must explain the court’s

analysis.”); Mayer, 102 Wn. App. at 82-83 (“Because the trial court made no findings

regarding the specific challenged items, the record does not allow for a proper review of

these issues.”).

To provide an adequate record for review, “‘[a]n [attorney fee] award of