Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Fulton v. Allard's Moving & Storage, Inc., 139 N.H. 582 (1995)

Citation
Fulton v. Allard's Moving & Storage, Inc., 139 N.H. 582 (1995)
Parent Document
Fulton v. Allard's Moving & Storage, Inc., 139 N.H. 582 (1995)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
1995-06-06

Full Text

786 chars
The plaintiff’s last argument is that the trial court erred by finding that the $750 per month storage charge was reasonable. We will not disturb the factual findings of the trial court unless they are not supported by the evidence or are erroneous as a matter of law. McCabe v. Arcidy, 138 N.H. 20, 24, 635 A.2d 446, 449 (1993). The court below heard testimony that the defendant had filed a rate schedule with the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, that the rate was based on the weight of the goods stored per month, that it calculated the charge of $750 per month based on that rate, and that the rate was not arbitrarily set for this case. We hold that the trial court had sufficient evidence to find that the rate of $750 per month was reasonable. Affirmed. All concurred.