Fulton v. Allard's Moving & Storage, Inc., 139 N.H. 582 (1995)

Citation: Fulton v. Allard's Moving & Storage, Inc., 139 N.H. 582 (1995)
Parent Document: Fulton v. Allard's Moving & Storage, Inc., 139 N.H. 582 (1995)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 1995-06-06
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8091445/fulton-v-allards-moving-storage-inc/ ↗

Full Text

532 chars

The plaintiff argues that the defendant cannot have a valid lien because some of the property it holds may be exempt from attachment under RSA 511:2 (1983). RSA 511:2 exempts certain personal property from attachment and execution. That property is exempt from sale under judicial process, however, does not prevent it from being subject to a carrier’s lien and being sold to satisfy that lien. See Tomson v. Lerner, 25 P.2d 209, 211 (N.M. 1933) (landlord’s lien); Kelly v. Hood, 118 P.2d 1016, 1017 (Okla. 1941) (innkeeper’s lien).

Other Sections in This Document (11)

Full Text