Section three
- Citation
- Section three
- Parent Document
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-06-30
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- Section three
- Section three
- Section three
Full Text
459 charsSection three is part of the original lease, which is in writing and signed by both the defendant and Pease. There is no dispute that the original lease satisfied the statute of frauds. The defendant and Pease were therefore not required to formally execute a new agreement. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court erred when it ruled that a new writing was required to satisfy the statute of frauds and extend the terms of the original lease agreement.