190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- Citation
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- Parent Document
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-06-30
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- 190 Elm Street Realty, LLC v. Beaudoin, 151 N.H. 205 (2004)
- Section three
- Section three
- Section three
Full Text
552 charsAfter making the requisite demand for rent and serving the defendant with a notice to quit, the plaintiff filed a writ in Manchester District Court seeking to recover possession of the premises. See RSA 540:13 (Supp. 2003). After a hearing, the district court ruled that the statute of frauds rendered the lease agreement invalid after the expiration of the initial five-year term. Consequently, the court ruled that the defendant was a tenant at will and her failure to pay the increased rent was sufficient grounds for eviction. This appeal followed.